The First Virgin America A320 With Sharklets

The first Virgin America A320 with Sharklets – Photo: Virgin America

This story was written by John Cameron for AirlineReporter…

The 2014 Airline Quality Rating report was released last week and, for the second year in a row, Virgin America was ranked #1 amongst major US carriers. How did the other airlines fare? Who received the dubious distinction of being ranked worst? You’ll have to read on to find out.

But first, a bit of background information.

The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) report has been published annually since 1991. Yes, 24 years. That’s a long, long time in the commercial aviation industry. To put that into perspective, consider that the AQR predates the prohibition of in-flight smoking in the US (1998), the Embraer ERJ family (1995), the Boeing 777 (1994), the Airbus A330 (1992), and even the ubiquitous Bombardier CRJ (which took to the air one month after the inaugural AQR report was released).

Back then, as the 1990s were just dawning, professors Brent Bowen and Dean Headley realized that the majority of existing airline rating systems relied heavily on subjective surveys of customer opinion that were infrequently collected and largely unreliable. What was needed was a timely, objective, and quantitative rating system that could be used to compare airline performance from year to year.

Thus, the Airline Quality Rating was born.

aqr_mrkt_lede_opt

According to the authors, the AQR is ’œa multi-factor, weighted average approach’ that utilizes ’œdata that reports actual airline performance on critical quality criteria important to consumers and combines them into a rating system. The final result is a rating for individual airlines with interval scale properties that is comparable across airlines and across time periods.’

That’s a fancy way of saying ’“ ’œwe’re going to examine legit airline performance and satisfaction data, and see which airline serves its customers the best.’

You may already see a flaw in this approach. After all, considering the fierce competition and razor-thin profit margins of the airline industry, what CEO in his/her right mind would willingly divulge the type of data that is required to compile this kind of report?

Fortunately, professors Bowen and Headley had an ally in their corner ’“ the United States government. More accurately, the Department of Transportation (DOT). Thanks to a little-known federal regulation (or, well, ’œlittle known’ outside of the airline industry), the professors wouldn’t have to beg the airlines for the data ’“ the airlines, themselves, are required to report it to the DOT each and every month (if they have an annual revenue of at least 1% of the total revenue for all domestic airlines.)

The report utilizes numerous weighted metrics for measuring on-time performance, involuntary denied boardings, mishandled luggage and various types of customer complaints to arrive at a final AQR score.

The formula for all of this?

This the AQR formula.

This the AQR formula

Don’t worry, math was never my favorite subject either. Luckily, we have professors Bowen and Headley to sort it  out for us. All we have to do is sit back and take advantage of their hard work.

So, let’s get into the details of this year’s report.

We’ve already established that Virgin America is the champion for the second year in a row. It’s worth noting that they actually improved their score from last year, although their on-time performance took a slight hit ’“ falling from 83.5% to 82.1%. Surprisingly, Virgin America’s customer complaint score of 1.28 per 100,000 passengers is a little above the industry average. However, the rest of their scores were enough to make up for that one blemish.

A JetBlue A320 - Photo: cclark395 / Flickr CC

JetBlue A320 – Photo: cclark395 / Flickr CC

Second place goes to low-cost carrier JetBlue, who overcame a slight worsening of their on-time performance (vs. the previous year) with a stellar score for denied boardings (or, more accurately, lack thereof) and a solid track record of making sure customer baggage gets where it needs to go.

The rest of the top five include Hawaiian Airlines (best on-time performance of all major airlines, but amazing weather helps), Delta, and Alaska Airlines.

Which airlines have some work to do? Well, out of the 15 carriers included in the report, the bottom three include ExpressJet in 13th place, SkyWest in 14th, and American Eagle bringing up the rear with a distant 15th place ranking (and an on-time performance score of 72.1% combined with 5.9 mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers ’“ the worst ranking in both categories).

Many of the findings jump right out of the pages and are easily interpreted from the numbers:

  • You want an on-time flight? Go with Hawaiian, Alaska, Delta, Virgin America, or US Airways.
  • Want to make sure you don’t get bumped from your flight? Go with JetBlue, Virgin America, Hawaiian, Alaska, or American.
  • Concerned about your luggage getting to your destination? Fly with Virgin America, JetBlue, Frontier, Delta, or Hawaiian.

The report is full of interesting statistics and offers noteworthy insight into the industry as a whole. Best of all, it’s free to download.

It just might make your next travel decision an easy one.

From time-to-time we will share contributions from others on AirlineReporter. If you have strong writing skills, a passion for aviation and a story to tell, then learn about potentially sharing your story and then contact us. guest@airlinereporter.com

https://www.airlinereporter.com
Time Lapse Video: LOT Gets Retro Livery on E-175
3 Comments

I love Virgin America! They deserve this win 🙂

This survey is bunk. Endeavor Air, which placed 6th, is a subsidiary of Delta. Therefore, they are not directly responsible or accountable for mishandled baggage or denied boardings. These metrics are handled by the mainline partner, in this case Delta.

When you include a formula, you should at least indicate what the abbreviations mean. For some of us, Math was our favourite subject, you know?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *