March was a big month for Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner. The largest member of the family — the 787-10 — saw its first delivery. We also learned about two new Dreamliner routes delivering on the plane’s promise to make ultra-long-haul routes feasible. With its direct flight from Perth to London, Qantas became the first airline to run a scheduled service nonstop from Australia to Europe. And later this year, Air New Zealand will inaugurate a new nonstop route to Chicago O’Hare.
Read on for more details on these exciting Dreamliner updates!
Qantas launches the first direct route from Australia to Europe
In late March, Australian carrier Qantas inaugurated QF9, which flew without stopping from Perth to London Heathrow — a 17-hour journey over a whopping 9,010 miles. At least for now, it’s one of the top three longest routes in the world.
The first flight was operated with a 787-9 sporting a gorgeous livery inspired by Australia’s indigenous peoples.
Two crews operated the ultra-long-haul flight.
The flight flew a fairly direct route, maxing out at 40,000 feet final cruise altitude before touching down in London on schedule.
Qantas’ fleet of 787-9s features a sweet-looking staggered business class seat. Behind the premium economy section in the middle of the plane, economy is in a tight nine-abreast configuration that some passengers might find tough for a 17-hour flight — though at least Qantas provides 32-inch pitch.
Air New Zealand announces a new direct route to Chicago O’Hare
Starting from the same region of the globe but heading in the opposite direction, Air New Zealand unveiled a new planned route that will connect its Auckland hub with Chicago O’Hare International Airport 8,184 miles away. Flights will begin on November 30th of this year.
The flight will take 15 hours northbound and 16 hours southbound. It will use the newer, more premium-heavy of Air New Zealand’s two 787-9 seating configurations.
Coinciding with Air New Zealand’s announcement, alliance partner United noted that it will turn its seasonal San Francisco – Auckland service into a year-round route. It’s one of the (few) United routes that feature the true Polaris seat — at least for part of the year.
BONUS: Taking a United 787-9 Delivery Flight – More Than Just A Plane
The benefits of ultra-long-haul direct routes
The sorts of ultra-long-haul routes enabled by Boeing’s Dreamliner and Airbus’ A350 aren’t just good for bragging rights (though they’re definitely good for those). They meet a need for direct point-to-point travel as an alternative to routings through mega-hubs. There’s the obvious time advantages from cutting out a connection. Then there’s avoidance of hassle associated with flight transfers — and the potential for irregular operations to mess them up.
Another win with direct flights is that the routing from origin to destination is fully customizable, allowing the flight to take advantage of optimal winds. Add a connection along the way and you add constraints on the route.
It’s thrilling to see the sorts of new routes that are possible — and financially feasible — thanks to the Dreamliner. We’ll be excited to cover more new 787 (and A350) routes over the next few years!
Bonus photos: Singapore Airlines’ 787-10 delivery and new onboard product
BONUS: Singapore Airlines Returns To Ultra-Long-Haul Flying. Ready?
Now it’s time for us to hear from you. Are you excited about the new Dreamliner routes? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
I love the idea of long-haul flying this way, but in practice it’s can’t be super fun outside of business/first – at least for a non-AvGeek. I’m flying (economy!) LAX-SIN in July on United (789). I know that flight has been around a little while now, but it’s going to be a marathon. Can’t wait!
The range of the 787-9 and A350-ULR is not new. There is no route which can be physically be flown with these new planes which could not be flown previously with a 777. What is new is the size of the planes. What is new are small planes with very long ranges; these new aircraft are significantly smaller with fewer seats. That is important because most of these ultra long distance routes are long-n-thin. The reason they weren’t flown previously was that airlines did not believe that could fill a 777 and there is nothing more costly than flying a half empty plane.
In this regard, the 787-9 is a better and more interesting product because it is 250 seats vs 320 for the A350-900ULR. It flies 76% the number of passengers on 74% the installed thrust. This allows for thinner routes to be viable. Remember, if the routes were long but not thin they would have put a 777 on it a decade ago. The A350-ULR is not as interesting because it is basically the same capacity as a 777-200LR. Yes, it is a bit lighter and a little lower per seat-mile, but anything that is viable for the A350-ULR was also viable for the 777-200LR hence it is not actually opening up anything new.